Coproduce.Brussels: creating the Coway approach

The intense co-working weekend in Brussels led the Coproduce.it collective to rethink a way of creating synergy and collaborating on projects, competitions, initiatives. A Coway manifesto has been drafted and will be soon available on this blog. In the meantime here are some of the moments of the Coproduce.Brussels experience.

Thanks to Christian De Neef, Kristina Tool, Dimitri Berti, Vincenzo Di Maria, Jonas Piet, Marianna Recchia, Benoit de Bellefroid, Arne van Oosterom, Erika Claessens.

If It’s Friday This Must Be Belgium

Coproduce Brussels 2012 [10-12 February]

Since making it to the semifinal rounds in the Euclid Network’s International Competition for Social Innovation, coproduce.it has been keeping connected virtually and in small group meetings. Thanks to tools like Skype, Dropbox, email and Google Docs we have been mulling over our next steps, but now it is time to replace the virtual and remote with the real and face to face. Milan’s Unconference was the last time we were all together in one place and so we are looking forward to the coproduce.it weekend in Brussels, February 10-12

coproduce.it member Christian De Neef, whose home turf is Brussels, is helping to organize meetings for our group in some of the local coworking spaces on Saturday. Sunday’s activities include a coproduce.eat brunch where we will be able to have an exchange with local designers and design thinkers over some tasty food.

All work and no play makes Jack (aka coproduce.it?) a dull boy. We plan to mix the sights, sounds and tastes in to inspire our brains and energize us for the big tasks of the weekend. Keep posted on the weekend’s activities on Twitter, with #coproduce.bru, #coproduce.eat and as always here on coproduce.it

NAPLES 2.0 and the Euclid Network International Social Innovation Competition

Here we are again! The Coproduce.it collective is back after some months in which its members have been engaged in different kind of professional experiences, made some important changes in their lives and continued to expand our knowledge on social innovation tools and models. We are also welcoming our newest member Dmitri Berti, a strategic designer currently based in Trieste, Italy.

In this period we have been actively seeking an opportunity to work together. We have searched for a project in which to combine our skills and personalities in application of the coproduction approach. We were able to find an opportunity with The Euclid Network, a London nonprofit, which launched the Naples 2.0 competition. The competition is seeking the best social innovation ideas for six identified challenges and involves strategic local partners in addressing critical problems of the city.



Dimitri Berti, Christian De Neef, Vincenzo di Maria, Marianna Recchia and Kristina Tool worked together to develop an innovative proposal in response to the challenge following codesign and coproduction principles.

As Euclid’s executive director Filippo Addari explains in an interview the competition is aimed at tackling local problems in Naples, which is “…a symbol of state and market failures, in a place where … social institutions are known for corruption, where there are no large corporations and the place, it seems run by Camorra, I think that is the right place for social innovators to show that they can provide solutions where traditional recipes failed. This is why we are going there.” video

Coproduce.it decided to work with the association Maestri di Strada, a non profit organisation that operates in the education fields and focuses on marginalised young people in Naples. Its aim is to reduce the school drop out rate in quarters where it exceeds the 30%. Cesare Moreno, one of MdS founders, introduced us to their world and engaged with us in an early brainstorming session, exploring ideas and new business models for the association. In these past months we have been researching, developing and refining our proposal shaped around that conversation.

Please check out  the following links  for information and supporting material on the competition:

Research and case studies
Presentation
Glossary

The importance of trust in Service Design

Artemis Yagou has sent us the transcription of her interesting intervention during the UnConference in Milan. We have discussed a lot about trust, especially within the Italian context, and invite you to give further comments about the topic:

Hello from sunny Athens, I am Artemis Yagou [www.yagou.gr, artemis@yagou.gr].

 This will be a short intervention on the issue of trust in Service Design, trusting between people involved in services and co-production.

We all understand that the effective functioning of a democratic society—including social, business, and political interactions—largely depends on trust. Creating an environment of trust is at the very heart of personal and organizational success. Many studies show that high–trust organizations have increased value, accelerated growth, enhanced innovation, improved collaboration, stronger partnering, better execution, and heightened loyalty. Yet trust remains a very fragile and elusive resource in many of the organizations that make up society’s building blocks.

The big question is: how to create and build trust?

Creating trust is very hard but it is also a common task in many areas. The biological roots of trust and their implications for human relationships have been studied extensively. In the design domain, trust is crucial for designers’ attempts to create and work out realistic paths from the present toward desirable futures and propose them to those who can bring a design to fruition. Successful designs depend on designers’ ability to enroll stakeholders into their projects, even if these stakeholders pursue their own interests as well. The paths that designers invite stakeholders to take must be presented as realistic, affordable, of benefit to those whose effort is required, and, above all, open valuable opportunities to those affected by a design. Therefore designers need to propose projects that attract others to participate; they need to ensure stakeholders’ consensus by inspiring trust.

In this sense, trust lies at the heart of Service Design activities which define many of our interactions and daily life activities within a modern society.

 My intervention is inspired by the Greek context, where the creation of trust is of particular importance for the future of social services and for the evolution of civic society in general. Greece is a country with a long history of tension or even hostility between citizens and the State. The longstanding distrust and resulting disrespect for the law and government have been having a major impact on public services. The absence of effective institutional procedures and the increasing problems of anarchy reflect the absence of trust between various stakeholders of Greek society.

 Thus, a number of questions involving trust arise and form the backbone of necessary future research:

How is trust created, maintained and solidified?

How to rebuild trust, in cases when it has been undermined or destroyed?

What are the costs for society of citizens’ distrust of public services?

What is the role of State organizations and bureaucracies?

How to build trust in a multicultural society?

What is the role of trust in times of crisis?

How may trust be developed within a Service Design context?

How may trust be built into the design of products and services?

How can design help develop or restore trust towards public sector services?

What are the particular problems engendered in Service Design projects where the State is one of the chief stakeholders?

What can be learnt from examples of good practice in this area?

What strategies may designers use in order to maximize trust on behalf of various stakeholders?

 I believe that the area of trust is a great challenge for the co-production in public services and worth looking at with great attention.

 That’s all I wanted to say and I hope it may cause some discussion during this Unconference. Thank you for asking me to participate!

 

Co-production in planning for the intercultural city

Where different ethnic and religious communities co-exist, cohesion and prosperity depend on whether interaction between them generates a culture of curiosity, openness and innovation.

I think that it is at the local level that it possible to manage most effectively the cultural dimension of integration, prepare the wider community or increase the competence of policy-makers, public services and the people in general, to start co-creating a “new society”.

My presentation at the Unconferenc in Milan was about how co-production could assume the intercultural dimension to foster integration process and contribute building a more inclusive society.


pazienti.org

1. Which is the motivation behind your action/project: MOTIVATION?

The basic motivation which led off pazienti.org was the wish to do something really positive to meet the needs of people (patients) and let them become the leading actors of their choices, enabling them to be fully aware of those same choices by sharing contents related to public and half public health service. To achieve this goal the most effective tool is the web, which is democratic by definition. pazienti.org is born from the will to give people the opportunity to choose on the base of other patients’ opinions, and to offer hospitals a medium to enable a dialogue with their patients, to define their offer and to explain what eventually went wrong and give reasons for it. Also, in some, and not so rare cases, to thank patients who express their satisfaction.

The core idea is to create a link between two actors (the health service and the patients) who, by definition, don’t communicate very easily.

2. Is your product/service co-productive and if, how: USERS’ INVOLVEMENT?

pazienti.org is a social project based on a choral and partecipatory contribute. The task of our team is  to filter out the updated infos we get from hospitals which aim to visibility and transparency in order to improve their reputation and become popolar with patients. Moreover, we collect patients inputs and make them available to hospital managers and doctors. In addition, we have a BLOG, focused on prevention and healthcare, through which we spread simple and easycontents.

Our aim is to involve people and have them partecipate actively in something as precious as healthcare. We wish to implement a crowdsourcing service enabling anyone, in the full respect of privacy policies, to get privately in touch with those whose stories he is interested in.

3. Which difficulties did you encounter in involving stakeholders and building communities: THE PROCESS?

Since its foundation to this day, pazienti.org has been completely self-financed even if we’re considering some potential investors offers.Today, creating a web start-up with ambitious social aims and wishing to make it a business it’s a very hard challenge. And an even harder one in Italy, where digital process is at a standstill and a plethora of laws choke off enterpreneurs and potential partners.

In Italy there isn’t a young enterpreneurial culture strongly motivated by a desire of innovation and by the need to influence the present reality. Here not many young people, after graduation, take into consideration the possibility of becoming enterpreneurs. And, contrary to what happens in many other countries, young enterpreneurs are not regarded as innovators.

As for the community, we’re working on it: our contents are shared on facebook and twitter and we’ve had a significant help from a breast cancer prevention campaign which has been shared 12K and has given us great visibility. Until a few days ago our absolute priority was to create a good web site, a tool that could be easily used both by patients and hospitals. Now we can focus on building a motivated and huge (!!) community!

4. Which is your business model? Is your service self-sustaining in economic terms: SUSTAINABILITY?

Under definition, see 5.

5. What evidence/benefits (qualitative & quantitative indicators) there is to show that the expected changes are happening in reality: MEASURING IMPACT?

As I said, even if we’re online in beta versione since May 2010, somehow we’re just at the beginning. Our project has arisen the interest of many environments and single persons in the web and technology world: we’re high in search engine (SEO) but, again as I said, we’ve not yet built an enlarged community that can give us the opportunity  to collect as many stories/experiences as we want.

First of all we had to privilege the setting-up of our device and of the data base it’s grounded on, now we are going to concentrate on what our tool can enable (perform) as for what the starting up of a virtuous feedback is concerned.

We are aware that we’ve not promoted our project on any media (other than social networks) and by now we can feel enough satisfied for what we achieved.The path is very long but the first steps reserved us some nice, encouraging surprises, as for example the echo we had with the IO MI PALPO campaign.